Remind me, who are we fighting?
In recent weeks I have been dismayed at the slagging off that some hard working individuals have been receiving on internet forums, message boards etc.
Why? Well in at least one forum the planned livery of a loco is being attacked. Yes this loco never carried it in BR service but the group’s management team suggested it and it was voted on at the AGM (and accepted). Now some members who didn’t bother to attend the AGM or authorise a proxy to vote, and a few non-members are up in arms. The criticism as I understand it is that they are accusing the committee of undemocratic behaviour.
The vitriol has now risen to such an extent as to be nauseous. It has become deeply personal and, from what I see, likely to be deeply damaging too.
What the members and non-members must understand is that the committee are all volunteers who put in their time for free. It doesn’t matter if the work is engineering, administration, or fund raising related, it still takes time, in many cases more than 20 hours a week.
If these hard working individuals get fed up with the complaints, they may just stand down. Who is then going to replace them? Do the replacements have the right skills and the time to give up to the cause?
Yes, discussion and genuine complaint is good, and the democratic process is there to allow management teams to be changed. But unless there is wrong doing or there is an obvious and capable replacement waiting in the wings, you may just find that replacing a dedicated enthusiastic committee member is harder that you think.
But above all remember we are all in this for the fun of it, so keep the discussions frank, honest and open, encourage dissent, and do not expect everyone agree with you. But there is never any place for petty arguments, rudeness and person insults. Surely our fight must be with rust and those who stop our beloved locomotives from operating in a safe and regulated way, not with those individuals who actually make it happen!
Why? Well in at least one forum the planned livery of a loco is being attacked. Yes this loco never carried it in BR service but the group’s management team suggested it and it was voted on at the AGM (and accepted). Now some members who didn’t bother to attend the AGM or authorise a proxy to vote, and a few non-members are up in arms. The criticism as I understand it is that they are accusing the committee of undemocratic behaviour.
The vitriol has now risen to such an extent as to be nauseous. It has become deeply personal and, from what I see, likely to be deeply damaging too.
What the members and non-members must understand is that the committee are all volunteers who put in their time for free. It doesn’t matter if the work is engineering, administration, or fund raising related, it still takes time, in many cases more than 20 hours a week.
If these hard working individuals get fed up with the complaints, they may just stand down. Who is then going to replace them? Do the replacements have the right skills and the time to give up to the cause?
Yes, discussion and genuine complaint is good, and the democratic process is there to allow management teams to be changed. But unless there is wrong doing or there is an obvious and capable replacement waiting in the wings, you may just find that replacing a dedicated enthusiastic committee member is harder that you think.
But above all remember we are all in this for the fun of it, so keep the discussions frank, honest and open, encourage dissent, and do not expect everyone agree with you. But there is never any place for petty arguments, rudeness and person insults. Surely our fight must be with rust and those who stop our beloved locomotives from operating in a safe and regulated way, not with those individuals who actually make it happen!
